Building and sustaining communities of teaching
Building and sustaining communities of teaching
Two recent education conferences I attended raised similar questions about developing and sustaining high-quality teaching. Things like:
Two recent education conferences I attended raised similar questions about developing and sustaining high-quality teaching. Things like:
Financing public higher education has grown increasingly challenging, with state funding for research universities declining by an average of 28 percent since 2003. What were once state-supported institutions have in many cases become quasi-private institutions to which states provide some money but still want full control.
Asked to describe the things that help them learn, students provide a remarkably consistent list:
That’s hardly a complete list, but those ideas came up again and again during a focus group at KU’s recent Student Learning Symposium. Not surprisingly, those same components come up again and again in research on learning.
Education changes people.
Those of us who teach know that well. We see students transform during their degrees, and sometimes during a semester. Their skills improve. Their thinking deepens. Their confidence blossoms.
Among academics, online education inspires about as much enthusiasm as a raft sale on a cruise ship.
That’s unfortunate, given that higher education’s cruise ship has a hull full of leaks and has been taking on water for years.
Innovation, meet frustration.
I’ve written frequently about how the lack of a reward system hampers (if not quashes) attempts to improve teaching and learning, especially at research universities. A new survey only reinforces that short-sighted approach.
The spread of evidence-based teaching practices highlights a growing paradox: Even as instructors work to evaluate student learning in creative, multidimensional ways, they themselves are generally judged only through student evaluations.
Hundreds of start-ups and established companies promoted their ideas and educational technology products at the ASU GSV Summit last week in San Diego. Many were quite good, even if they didn’t live up to the magic that some of them promised.
The ASU GSV Summit bills itself as a gathering of entrepreneurs, policymakers, business leaders and educators who want “to create partnerships, explore solutions, and shape the future of learning.”
Three students in an upper-level physics class designed and built a tabletop lightboard for their final project this semester.
Lightboards are used in creating online videos for classes. They allow instructors to write on a glass pane as they would a whiteboard. A camera is positioned facing the instructor, capturing the writing on the glass as the instructor speaks. The image must then be flipped so that the writing can be read in the video. The approach is especially popular among STEM instructors.