Criteria |
0 |
1 |
2 |
Choose
Tune/Concept for Project (2 points) |
Student
did not turn in name of tune/concept without prompting |
Student
turned in name of tune/concept late |
Student
turned in name of tune/concept on time |
Class
Description |
No
mention of grade/level |
Grade/level
indicated |
|
(one page overview) (8 points) |
No
mention of area: general music or choral or band or strings |
Music
setting area indicated |
|
|
No
schedule for setting/ensemble included: time, days, length of class |
Minimal
detailed schedule provided |
Detailed
schedule of setting/ensemble included |
|
No
information about what teacher is preparing for: concert, contest, concept development |
|
Detailed
description provided about targeted preparation |
|
No
mention of school name, concept/tune identified |
|
School
name included and concept/tune labeled |
Criteria |
0 |
2 |
5 |
Outline
for Lessons w/Timings (20 points) |
No
outline for lessons turned in |
Outline
for lessons turned in late |
Outline
for lessons turned in |
|
Dates/timings
do not correspond with class description |
|
Timings
correspond with class description |
|
Timings
for each tune/concept for each scheduled class period/lesson is not included |
Minimal
attention is given to timings for tune/concept for each lesson, sketchy
information provided |
Each
lesson is outlined with what is the goal for that day and how much time will
be spent on this tune/concept each day |
|
Progression
of lessons and topic attention is not logical |
Somewhat
logical sequence of lessons to attain target |
Logical
sequence of events leading target is indicated |
Criteria |
0 |
5 |
10 |
Lesson
Plans (50 points) |
Lesson
plans are not consistent with plan turned in with outline |
Lesson
plans are somewhat consistent with that indicated in outline |
Lessons
plans for each lesson from outline is included |
|
Instructional goals and objectives are not stated.
Learners cannot tell what is expected of them. Learners cannot determine what
they should know and be able to do as a result of learning and instruction. |
Instructional goals and objectives are stated but are
not easy to understand. Learners are given some information regarding what is
expected of them. Learners are not given enough information to determine what
they should know and be able to do as a result of learning and instruction. |
Instructional
goals and objectives clearly stated. Learners have a clear understanding of
what is expected of them. Learners can determine what they should know and be
able to do as a result of learning and instruction. |
|
Instructional
process is not indicated in sequential format for each lesson or is not
detailed enough for replication |
Instructional
process is indicated for each lesson plan and is somewhat appropriate for the
goal/objective and setting and able to be replicated |
Instructional
process is indicated for each lesson plan and is appropriate for the
goal/objective and setting and is easily replicated |
|
Method
for assessing student learning and evaluating instruction is missing |
Method
for assessing student learning and evaluating instruction is vaguely stated |
Method
for assessing student learning and evaluating instruction is clearly
delineated |
Criteria |
0 |
2 |
5 |
|
Objectives
and method of assessment do not match |
There
is some connection between objectives and methods of assessment |
Each
objective has a clearly indicated method of assessment |
|
Material
list is missing |
Material
list is provided but incomplete |
Material
list is provided and complete |
|
|
|
|
Adaptations
for Disabilities (20
points) |
No
description of assigned students with disabilities is included in the
document |
A
vague description of assigned students with disabilities is included in the
document |
Description
of assigned students with disabilities is included in the document in detail |
|
Not
all lessons have a description of how the lesson would be adapted |
Most
lessons have a description of how the lesson would be adapted |
All
lessons have a description of how the lesson would be adapted |
|
Adaptations
are not clearly written with details of how the lesson adapted somewhat
sloppy |
Adaptations
are adequate with basic information provided for the teacher of how to adapt
the lesson |
Adaptations
are appropriate, detailed, and creative for the students with disabilities |
|
Students
with disabilities are only included in a portion of the lesson components
with minimal attention to multisensory opportunities |
Students
with disabilities are somewhat included across the lesson with attention to
some areas of multisensory learning |
Care
is taken to include the student with disability in all areas of the lesson
with multisensory opportunities for learning described |
Total
Score ___________/100 points